Judge rejects Apple's plea for Samsung smartphone ban

Samsung infringement of some Apple iPhone features doesn't merit sales ban, rules federal Judge Lucy Koh. Apple's $1 billion court victory against Samsung was for the latter copying 'a few narrow protected functions.' ??

By Associated Press / December 18, 2012

A passerby photographs an Apple store logo with his Samsung Galaxy in central Sydney in this September file photograph. A U.S. judge on Dec. 17, 2012, denied Apple Inc's request for a permanent injunction against Samsung Electronics' smartphones.

Tim Wimborne/Reuters/File

Enlarge

A federal judge has denied a legal request by?Apple?Inc. to ban U.S. sales of Samsung smartphone models that a jury in August said illegally used?Apple?technology.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

The decision is part of a series of rulings that U.S. Judge Lucy Koh says she is releasing over a period of several weeks to address the many legal issues raised in the case.

Koh's ruling Monday night comes after?Apple?this summer was awarded $1.05 billion in damages. A jury found Samsung had copied critical features of the iPhone and iPad.

Apple?had urged the judge to permanently ban the U.S. sales of eight Samsung smartphone models, while also seeking to add millions more to the award. A jury in August said the South Korean firm illegally used Apple?technology.

"The phones at issue in this case contain a broad range of features, only a small fraction of which are covered by?Apple's?patents," Koh wrote in her ruling. "Though?Apple?does have some interest in retaining certain features as exclusive to?Apple, it does not follow that entire products must be forever banned from the market because they incorporate, among their myriad features, a few narrow protected functions," she wrote.

Earlier this month, Koh appeared ready to trim the $1 billion jury verdict?Apple?won over Samsung Electronics, but gave no indication as to by how much.

Adding to the legal tangle,?Apple?filed a second lawsuit earlier this year, alleging that Samsung's newer products are unfairly using?Apple's?technology. That's set for trial in 2014. In addition, the two companies are locked in legal battles in several other countries.

Apple?lawyer Harold McElhinny claimed earlier this year that Samsung "willfully" made a business decision to copy?Apple's?iPad and iPhone, and he called the jury's $1.05 billion award a "slap in the wrist."

Samsung lawyer Charles Verhoeven has argued that?Apple?was trying to tie up Samsung in courts around the world rather than competing with it head-on. Samsung has also claimed that it was deprived of a fair trial in a courthouse about a dozen miles (20 kilometers) from?Apple's?Cupertino, California, headquarters.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/xm6VOfsjAQI/Judge-rejects-Apple-s-plea-for-Samsung-smartphone-ban

idris elba kelsey grammer martin henderson mlk day golden globes 2012 winners golden globes 2012 red carpet golden globes red carpet